Whiskey’s for Drinkin’, Water’s for Fightin’

That, according to a Colorado local politician, is what they say in America. He was referring to the Colorado River, which is in a bit of strife, but even a quick look at the Pacific Institute’s fascinating and easy-to-read section on water conflict chronology demonstrates the world-wide applicability of the latter part of this saying.

Humanity has been going at it over water since at least 3000BC. And the disputes are coming thick and fast in the present day – from a 2007 murder in a suburban garden over water restrictions in Australia to the capture the Tishrin hydroelectric dam by Syrian rebels in 2012.


I visited one of the siphoning-off points of the (once) mighty Colorado. Just beyond Grand Lake township, in a carpark at the edge of the lake, stands the western portal of the Alva B. Adams tunnel. It is the point at which water collected from the western slope of the Colorado River is sent beneath the Rocky Mountains to emerge, a gravity-fed 33m lower, for distribution on the eastern side. Once there, it falls through five hydroelectric power plants which send some of the electricity back through a line in the tunnel for use in the pumping involved in the initial water collection.


IMG_6367 - Copy

Here’s some interesting tunnel numbers. Length:  21.1 km (13.1 miles); capacity: 16 cubic metres (550 cubic feet) of water per second ie 1,400,000 m3 (1,100 acre feet) per day. That’s a heck of a lot of irrigation, municipal and industrial usage, recreation, fish and wildlife support and rocks in one’s whiskey.

The tunnel was excavated from both ends. When it was holed through, alignment of the two centre lines was off by a mere 1.9cm (¾) inch vertically, and 1.27cm (½ inch) horizontally. Not bad for the surveying methods of 1940-44.


Lake Granby was created in 1950.

Alva B. Adams, a U.S. senator from Colorado, delighted the farmers on the east side of the Continental Divide with her insistence in Congress that this project was necessary. Other plans had failed to take off and those thirsty crops were awaitin’.


Now things are getting thirsty again.

About 30 million Americans in seven states depend on the water of the Colorado watershed. This growing population takes its toll through individual use and through industries that serve them. Throw in climate change and the situation is grim. For years, the US has been consuming more water from the Colorado River than the river receives from snow-melt in the Rocky Mountains. Several huge dams built on the river are emptying rapidly. The river now rarely reaches its delta in the Gulf of California.


A 1944 treaty with downstream Mexico regarding their allocation of water from the Colorado River has required reworking twice – in 1974 for water quality and in 2012 regarding quantity and timing. “We have chosen collaboration over conflict, we have chosen co-operation and consensus over discord,” the US Interior Secretary said of the revised treaty.

Many efforts are being made at the grass-roots level to conserve water. And these are having some effect. We need to remain alert about our own usage. And our tacit support of industries with high-water consumption and water-polluting practices needs consideration.

Otherwise, it will be a matter of ‘Let them drink, and grow our food with, whiskey’.


6 responses to “Whiskey’s for Drinkin’, Water’s for Fightin’

  1. This is just like the Murray River, which runs through 3 states in Australia. When the drought was at its worst, the water pretty much ran out well before it reached its final destination. Negotiations between the states to conserve and share have been less than successful, especially since the drought ended and the farming community no longer sees the urgency. What happens when the drought returns? Are we entering the age of the Water Wars?

    • THe Murray situation is a prime example of the fraught nature of the business of water. Everyone wants their share but the shares are more than the whole. I hope Australia does not disintegrate into internal water wars – surely that’s for a dystopian-future novel only.

  2. Since moving to Arizona and becoming a down-streamer to you, I’ve become much more conscious of water and its use. Where I lived before in Utah there is very little awareness of water.

  3. I have to say, Cuttlefish, that water and plastic (which these days often go hand-in-hand) are two of the things that I’m most concerned about. I plan to write a post soon (ish) about our water consumption, because it seems like the situation has reached critical levels. I’m not optimistic. I wish I could be, but I’m simply not. Thanks for this little kick in the butt.

    • Yes, water ownership and consumption, as well as excesses of water in increasingly-climate-change-related flooding, are causes for action. Plastic! Where would we start? I am taken aback by the amount of plastic packaging in the UK as compared with, say, Australia and Switzerland. Fruit and vegetables are lucky to escape a wrap or container here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s